Penerapan Metode AHP Untuk Membantu Siswa Memilih Jurusan Yang Tepat Di SMK

  • Frieyadie Frieyadie STMIK Nusa Mandiri Jakarta
  • Surya Mahendra Ramadhan STMIK Nusa Mandiri Jakarta
Keywords: Choosing Department, Vocational High School, Analytical Hierarchy Process, AHP

Abstract

Students of junior high school who are planning to continue their education to vocational school (SMK) must decide the choice, to the field or what majors will be chosen to continue their education later. And this is something quite difficult to decide by most junior high school students, especially those who do not have many references and seek information related to vocational education. Most of them are less mature to choose the majors that exist according to their ability, due to enough new students who fail in the middle of the road when they have been accepted in Vocational High School (SMK). The result of analysis of Analytical Hierarchy Process result calculation stated that the chosen alternative and most appropriate with criteria is Broadcast. With AHP results obtained from 3 respondents who then calculated and obtained the final result that Broadcast excels with a percentage value of 43% versus Accounting 27% and 31% Office Administration. Globally the most important factor prioritized in the selection of majors is the test score with a weighted value of 0.473 or 47% and the most priority majors are Broadcast majors with a score of 47%. The Analytical Hierarchy Process method can help schools in particular to determine some issues regarding the selection of majors. Because the AHP method is a method whose main input is human perception.

References

[1] J. Haryanto and S. Hansun, “Pengembangan Aplikasi Pendukung Keputusan Pemilihan Program Studi dengan Metode Fuzzy Logic (Studi Kasus: Universitas Multimedia Nusantara),” Ultim. Comput., vol. 7, no. 1, pp. 12–18, 2015.
[2] R. Rusdiansyah, “Analisis Keputusan Menentukan Jurusan Pada Sekolah Menengah Kejuruan Dengan Metode Simple Additive Weighting,” J. Techno Nusa Mandiri, vol. 14, no. 1, pp. 49–56, Mar. 2017.
[3] A. Arifin, “Teknik Two Stay Two Stray Dalam Bimbingan Kelompok Untuk Meningkatkan Wawasan Siswa Dalam Pemilihan Jurusan Di Perguruan Tinggi,” J. Psikol. Pendidik. dan Konseling J. Kaji. Psikol. Pendidik. dan Bimbing. Konseling, vol. 1, no. 1, p. 19, Aug. 2015.
[4] T. F. P. Siallagan, “Penentuan Program Studi Mahasiswa STKIP Subang dengan Algoritma C4.5,” Tekno Efisiensi J. Ilm. KORPRI Kopertis WIllayah IV, vol. 1, no. 1, pp. 101–111, 2016.
[5] D. Khuntari and R. Ferdiana, “Teknik Rekomendasi Pemilihan Jurusan Perguruan Tinggi dengan Pendekatan Preferensi Pengguna dan Analytic Hierarchy Process,” Semin. Nas. Teknol. Inf. dan Multimed., vol. 3, no. 1, p. 2.2-25-2.2-30, 2015.
[6] D. A. Latif, H. Hamdani, and Y. Yulianto, “Sistem Penunjang Keputusan Pemilihan Program Studi Di Universitas Mulawarman Menggunakan Metode Promethee,” Inform. Mulawarman J. Ilm. Ilmu Komput., vol. 8, no. 2, pp. 61–64, Jun. 2016.
[7] L. Swastina, “Penerapan Algoritma C4.5 Untuk Penentuan Jurusan Mahasiswa,” J. GEMA Aktual., vol. 2, no. 1, pp. 93–98, 2013.
[8] D. T. Budianto and A. Irawan, “Sistem Pendukung Keputusan untuk Menentukan Jurusan Siswa Baru di SMK Negeri 1 Kragilan Menggunakan Metode Naive Bayes,” ProTekInfo(Pengembangan Ris. dan Obs. Tek. Inform., vol. 1, no. 1, pp. 62–67, Jan. 2017.
[9] A. Wicaksono and N. Aminudin, “Perancangan Sistem Pendukung Keputusan Penentuan Jurusan Siswa Sma Pgri 2 Pringsewu Dengan Menggunakan Metode Analytical Hierarchy Proses (AHP),” PROCIDING KMSI, vol. 5, no. 1, pp. 16–24, Oct. 2017.
[10] A. A. Harahap, “Sistem Pendukung Keputusan Penentuan Jurusan Dengan Metode Analytical Hierarchy Process ( Studi Kasus : Smk Swasta Kartini Utama Sei Rampah ),” Pelita Inform. Budi Darma, vol. 9, no. 2, pp. 13–20, 2015.
[11] B. Hartono, Sistem Informasi Manajemen Berbasis Komputer, 1st ed. Jakarta: Rineka Cipta, 2013.
[12] Kusrini, Konsep dan Aplikasi Sistem Pendukung Keputusan, vol., no. 2007.
Published
2018-09-23
Section
Technology Information Article