Pengelolaan Data Terintegrasi Berdasarkan Instrumen Akreditasi Perguruan Tinggi 3.0 Menggunakan Zachman Framework

  • Ardhin Primadewi Universitas Muhammadiyah Magelang
  • Mukhtar Hanafi Universitas Muhammadiyah Magelang
Keywords: APT 3.0, higher education accreditation, higher education, integrated data, Zachman framework

Abstract

Higher education in Indonesia is regulated by the government with the Higher Education Accreditation (APT). In APT 3.0, Higher Education is required to be able to present performance data in the form of a Higher Education Performance Report (LKPT) as a reference in making a Self-Evaluation Report (LED). However, it is necessary to have an in-depth analysis to determine the gaps in the data required by Higher Education according to the APT 3.0 standard. The process of integrating the samples refer to the Zachman Framework (ZF). The results of this simplification that the data is available in support of APT 3.0 approximately 79% of the total data both inside and outside the core business of Higher Education and is well managed in an integrated database. The remaining 21% of the data that are not available is spread across several information systems, especially SIMMawa, SIMHumas and Cooperation, and SIMAKU. This shows that the change in accreditation standards that have been in effect since April 2019 has created a significant data gap for Higher Education. This research also produced an alternative model of integrated data management that can be used as input for Information System developers in the Higher Education scope.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

A. Primadewi et al., “Readiness analysis of accreditation data: A case study for Indonesian higher education,” J. Phys. Conf. Ser., vol. 1517, no. 1, 2020, doi: 10.1088/1742-6596/1517/1/012091.

M. Broto Legowo and B. Indiarto, “Model Sistem Penjaminan Mutu Berbasis Integrasi Standar Akreditasi BAN-PT dan ISO 9001:2008,” J. RESTI (Rekayasa Sist. dan Teknol. Informasi), vol. 1, no. 2, pp. 90–98, 2017, doi: 10.29207/resti.v1i2.51.

C. Aditya Wijaya, “Sistem Monitoring dan Evaluasi Pengelolaan Program Studi di Institusi Pendidikan Tinggi,” Indones. J. Inf. Syst., vol. 1, no. 1, pp. 13–24, 2018, doi: 10.24002/ijis.v1i1.1723.

Majelis Akreditasi (MA BAN-PT), “Kebijakan Instrumen Akreditasi BAN-PT dan LAM Berbasis SN DIKTI,” 2019. https://lldikti8.ristekdikti.go.id/wp-content/uploads/2019/02/20190220-Kebijakan-Instrumen-Akreditasi-BAN-PT-berbasis-SN-Dikti.pdf (accessed Oct. 30, 2019).

Badan Akreditasi Nasional Perguruan Tinggi, Akreditasi Perguruan Tinggi : Panduan Penyusunan Laporan Kinerja Perguruan Tinggi. 2018.

Badan Akreditasi Nasional Perguruan Tinggi, Akreditasi Perguruan Tinggi : Panduan Penyusunan Laporan Evaluasi Diri. 2018.

J. Lapalme, A. Gerber, A. Van Der Merwe, J. Zachman, M. De Vries, and K. Hinkelmann, “Exploring the future of enterprise architecture: A Zachman perspective,” Comput. Ind., vol. 79, no. July, pp. 103–113, 2016, doi: 10.1016/j.compind.2015.06.010.

E. Prasetyo, L. E. Nugroho, and M. N. Aji, “Perancangan Data Warehouse Sistem Informasi Eksekutif untuk Data Akademik Program Studi,” JNTETI J. Nas. Tek. Elektro dan Teknol. Inf., vol. 1, no. 3, pp. 13–20, 2012.

S. P. Utomo, N. H. Aliyah, Z. A. Sani, M. Hanafi, and A. Primadewi, “Perancangan RESTFul Web Service pada Sistem Informasi Terintegrasi Menggunakan FrameWork CodeIgniter,” in Seminar Nasional Dinamika Informatika, 2020, pp. 124–128.

Sopingi, E. Utami, and A. Amborowati, “PROTOTYPE EXECUTIVE INFORMATION SYSTEM UNTUK MENDUKUNG EVALUASI DIRI PERGURUAN TINGGI (Studi Kasus STMIK Duta Bangsa Surakarta),” J. Ilm. DASI, vol. 16, no. 02, pp. 66–74, 2015.

Fatoni, E. Supratman, and D. Antoni, “KERANGKA KERJA SISTEM INFORMASI EKSEKUTIF PERGURUAN TINGGI,” J. Teknol. Inf. dan Ilmu Komput., vol. 6, no. 3, pp. 257–266, 2019, doi: 10.25126/jtiik.20196946.

M. Hanafi, A. Primadewi, and S. Sunarni, “Pemodelan Arsitektur Data pada Perguruan Tinggi,” J. Rekayasa Sist. dan Teknol. Inf., vol. 2, no. 1, pp. 762–769, 2018.

B. Gupta, M. Goul, and B. Dinter, “Business Intelligence and Big Data in Higher Education,” Journals AIS Electron. Libr., vol. 36, no. 3, pp. 449–476, 2015, [Online]. Available: http://aisel.aisnet.org/cgi/viewcontent.cgi?article=3850&context=cais.

M. D. D. Ardhiansyah, Y. Priyandari, and R. W. Damayanti, “Implementasi Knowledge Management ( KM ) untuk Menunjang Akreditasi Program Studi ( Studi Kasus : Program Studi Tenik Industri, Fak. Teknik, Universitas Sebelas Maret Surakarta),” in Seminar Internasional dan Konferensi Nasional IDEC, 2016, pp. 564–571.

H. Thamrin and E. W. Pamungkas, “A Rule Based SWOT Analysis Application: A Case Study for Indonesian Higher Education Institution,” in Procedia Computer Science, 2017, vol. 116, pp. 144–150, doi: 10.1016/j.procs.2017.10.056.

W. Cheung and G. Babin, “A metadatabase-enabled executive information system (Part A): A flexible and adaptable architecture,” Decis. Support Syst., vol. 42, no. 3, pp. 1589–1598, 2006, doi: 10.1016/j.dss.2006.01.005.

W. Cheung and G. Babin, “A metadatabase-enabled executive information system (Part B): Methods for dynamic multidimensional data analysis,” Decis. Support Syst., vol. 42, no. 3, pp. 1599–1612, 2006, doi: 10.1016/j.dss.2006.01.008.

B. J. Ojuolape, T. Aduragba, A. A. Ajani, and A. A. Ahmed, “Overview Of Enterprise Architecture Frameworks and the Effects of Three Modelling Tools on their Usefulness,” in 2017 IEEE 3rd International Conference on Electro-Technology for National Development (NIGERCON), 2017, pp. 538–543, [Online]. Available: https://www.researchgate.net/publication/324897909_Overview_Of_Enterprise_Architecture_Frameworks_and_the_Effects_of_Three_Modelling_Tools_on_their_Usefulness.

S. Kotusev, “Fake and Real Tools for Enterprise Architecture : The Zachman Framework and Business Capability Model The Zachman Framework : A Fake Tool,” Enterp. Archit. Prof. J., no. August, pp. 1–14, 2019.

S. Bondar, J. C. Hsu, A. Pfouga, and J. Stjepandic, “Zachman framework in the agile digital transformation,” Adv. Transdiscipl. Eng., vol. 5, no. November, pp. 67–74, 2017, doi: 10.3233/978-1-61499-779-5-67.

T. Iyamu, “Implementation of the enterprise architecture through the Zachman Framework,” J. Syst. Inf. Technol., vol. 20, no. 01, pp. 2–18, 2018, doi: DOI 10.1108/JSIT-06-2017-0047 Implementation.

J. Leonardo and J. F. Andry, “DESIGN ENTERPRISE ARCHITECTURE FOR INDUSTRY OF TEXTILE USING ZACHMAN FRAMEWORK,” ICTACT J. Manag. Stud., vol. 05, no. 02, pp. 1022–1029, 2019, doi: 10.21917/ijms.2019.0140.

M. A. E. Nasution, R. Pane, W. Verina, Hardianto, and E. Desi, “Enterprise Architecture Analysis Using Zachman Framework,” in The 6th International Conference on Cyber and IT Service Management (CITSM 2018), 2019, pp. 1–4, doi: 10.1109/CITSM.2018.8674258.

Published
2020-12-25
How to Cite
Primadewi, A., & Hanafi, M. (2020). Pengelolaan Data Terintegrasi Berdasarkan Instrumen Akreditasi Perguruan Tinggi 3.0 Menggunakan Zachman Framework. Jurnal RESTI (Rekayasa Sistem Dan Teknologi Informasi), 4(6), 1124 -. https://doi.org/10.29207/resti.v4i6.2540
Section
Artikel Rekayasa Sistem Informasi