Penilaian Kinerja Dosen Menggunakan Metode TOPSIS (Studi Kasus : Amik Mitra Gama)

  • Candra Surya AMIK Mitra Gama
Keywords: Assessment, TOPSIS, Alternative

Abstract

To improve the quality or performance of lecturers need an assessment. Assessment of lecturers can be done by Leaders and Chairman of Study Program such as assessment of Teaching, Research, Dedication, Responsibility, Personality, Loyalty, Cooperation, Leadership. Problems that have occurred so far to assess the performance of lecturers are still not optimal because there is no system / method used for assessment. It is therefore necessary to  making a decision support system using the Technique For Other Reference by Similarity to Ideal Solution (TOPSIS). This method is able to choose the best alternative from the existing alternative. The alternative is the lecturer who will be assessed it’s performance. The result obtained by using this method is to know the lecturer who has the best performance. The best lecturers' determination will be issued in the form of numerical values and sorted by the largest value to the smallest value. From 5 alternative lecturers that have been tested are Lecturer 1, Lecturer 2, Lecturer 3 Lecturer 4 and Lecturer 5, then selected Lecturer 2 which has the best performance with a preference value of 0.5341.

References

[1] L. S. Chairy, 2005. Evaluasi dosen sebagai bentuk penilaian kinerja, Workshop Evaluasi. Kinerja Dosen oleh Mahasiswa.
[2] Marsonom, Ahmad Fitri Boy dan Wulan Dari, 2015, Sistem Pendukung Keputusan Pemilihan Menu Makanan pada Penderita Obesitas dengan menggunakan Metode TOPSIS. Jurnal SAINTIKOM, vol. 14
[3] Erik Kurniawan, Hindayati Mustafidah dan Anis Shofiyani, 2015, Metode TOPSIS untuk Menentukan Penerimaan Mahasiswa Baru Pendidikan Dokter di Universitas Muhammadiyah Purwokerto,Jurnal Juita, vol III, no. 4.
[4] I.H. Firdaus, et al., 2016, Sistem Pendukung Keputusan Penentuan Karyawan Terbaik Menggunakan Metode Ahp Dan TOPSIS, Seminar Nasional Teknologi Informasi dan Komunikasi (SENTIKA 2016) Yogyakarta, 18-19 Maret.
[5] Jamila, 2011. Sistem Pendukung Keputusan Pemilihan Subkontrak Menggunakan Metode Entropy dan TOPSIS. IJCCS Vol.5 No.2
[6] I. H. Firdaus, et al., 2016, Sistem Pendukung Keputusan Penentuan Karyawan Terbaik Menggunakan Metode Ahp Dan TOPSIS. Seminar nasional teknologi informasi dan komunikasi ( Sentika) .
[7] N. Rochmah, et al.,, 2009. Sistem Pendukung Keputusan Perencanaan Strategis Kinerja Instansi Pemerintah Menggunakan Metode Ahp, Jurnal Informatika., vol. 3, no 2
[8] Kusrini,2007. Konsep dan Aplikasi Sistem Pendukung Keputusan.
[9] E. Turban, 2005. Decision Support Systems and Intelligent Systems Edisi. Bahasa Indonesia Jilid 1.
[10] Subakti, 2002. Sistem Pendukung Keputusan
[11] M. I. I. Auliya Rahmayani, 2016. Perancangan dan Implementasi Perangkat Lunak Sistem Pendukung Keputusan Multi Kriteria Menggunakan MetodeTOPSIS.Jurnal Sains dan Seni ITS, vol. 5 no.2
[12] R. W. Sri Kusumadewi, Sri Hartati, Agus Harjoko, 2006. Fuzzy Multy-Attribute decision Making.
Published
2018-02-05
Section
Technology Information Article