Big Data-Driven Transformation of Social Science Research
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.29207/joseit.v4i2.7170Keywords:
big data, social science research, computational social science, data-driven researchAbstract
This study examines the transformative potential of big data integration in social science research and proposes systematic approaches for implementing data-driven methodologies through institutional innovation. The methodology encompasses systematic analysis of traditional research limitations, mechanistic investigation of big data integration effects on seven critical research phases (topic identification, literature synthesis, theoretical framework development, data acquisition, analytical processing and visualization, knowledge dissemination, and outcome evaluation), and institutional design analysis for philosophy and social science laboratory development. The analysis reveals that big data fundamentally transforms social science research through multiple mechanisms. The proposed laboratory framework addresses critical implementation challenges through seven strategic dimensions: institutional awareness enhancement, differentiated development pathways, computational infrastructure strengthening, specialized tool and platform development, interdisciplinary talent cultivation, comprehensive data resource construction, and supportive policy framework establishment.
References
S. John Walker, “Big Data: A Revolution That Will Transform How We Live, Work, and Think,” Int J Advert, vol. 33, no. 1, 2014, doi: 10.2501/ija-33-1-181-183.
A. G. Fallis, “The four V’s of big data,” Big Data, vol. 53, no. 9, 2013.
C. Cioffi-Revilla, “Computational social science,” 2010. doi: 10.1002/wics.95.
M. J. Salganik, Bit by bit: Social research in the digital age. 2017. doi: 10.1177/0267323120922090.
M. Grizioti and C. Kynigos, “Integrating Computational Thinking and Data Science: The Case of Modding Classification Games,” Informatics in Education, vol. 23, no. 1, 2024, doi: 10.15388/infedu.2024.03.
R. Kitchin, “Big Data, new epistemologies and paradigm shifts,” Big Data Soc, vol. 1, no. 1, 2014, doi: 10.1177/2053951714528481.
D. Blei, L. Carin, and D. Dunson, “Probabilistic topic models,” IEEE Signal Process Mag, vol. 27, no. 6, 2010, doi: 10.1109/MSP.2010.938079.
R. M. Bond et al., “A 61-million-person experiment in social influence and political mobilization,” Nature, vol. 489, no. 7415, 2012, doi: 10.1038/nature11421.
S. Lipovetsky, “Big Data and Social Science: Data Science Methods and Tools for Research and Practice,” Technometrics, vol. 63, no. 3, 2021, doi: 10.1080/00401706.2021.1945317.
D. Trilling, “Doing Computational Social Science with Python: An Introduction,” Social Science Research Network, 2017.
Z. Tufekci, “Big Questions for social media big data: Representativeness, validity and other methodological pitfalls,” in Proceedings of the 8th International Conference on Weblogs and Social Media, ICWSM 2014, 2014. doi: 10.1609/icwsm.v8i1.14517.
Frontiers in massive data analysis. 2013. doi: 10.17226/18374.
M. Makarow, M. Zic Fuchs, and C. Moulin, “Research Infrastructures in the Digital Humanities,” Humanities, no. September, 2011.
R. K. Yin, “Case study research: Design and methods.,” Applied Social Research Methods Series, vol. 18, no. 2, 2013, doi: 10.1097/00001610-199503000-00004.
D. Collier, “Understanding process tracing,” PS Polit Sci Polit, vol. 44, no. 4, 2011, doi: 10.1017/S1049096511001429.
K. A. Bollen, B. Entwisle, and A. S. Alderson, “Macrocomparative Research Methods,” Annu Rev Sociol, vol. 19, no. 1, 1993, doi: 10.1146/annurev.so.19.080193.001541.
“Systems of innovation: Technologies, institutions and organizations,” Long Range Plann, vol. 31, no. 2, 1998, doi: 10.1016/s0024-6301(98)90244-8.
P. Robinson, “Designing and Conducting Mixed Methods Research,” Aust N Z J Public Health, vol. 31, no. 4, 2007, doi: 10.1111/j.1753-6405.2007.00096.x.
D. Moher et al., “Preferred reporting items for systematic review and meta-analysis protocols (PRISMA-P) 2015 statement,” Revista Espanola de Nutricion Humana y Dietetica, vol. 20, no. 2, 2016, doi: 10.1186/2046-4053-4-1.
K. M. Eisenhardt, “Building Theories from Case Study Research,” Academy of Management Review, vol. 14, no. 4, 1989, doi: 10.5465/amr.1989.4308385.
N. K. Denzin, The Research Act: A Theoretical Introduction to Sociological Methods. 2017. doi: 10.4324/9781315134543.
S. Bhangu, F. Provost, and C. Caduff, “Introduction to qualitative research methods - Part i,” Perspect Clin Res, vol. 14, no. 1, 2023, doi: 10.4103/picr.picr_253_22.
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
Authors who publish with this journal agree to the following terms:
- Authors retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgment of the work's authorship and initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgment of its initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work (Refer to The Effect of Open Access).
