Comparative Performance of YOLOv12  in Detecting Fungal Skin Diseases in Cats

Bradika Almandin Wisesa; Vivin Mahat Putri; Evvin Faristasari; Sirlus Andreanto Jasman Duli; Satria Agus Darma

doi:10.29207/resti.v10i3.7446

Authors

Bradika Almandin Wisesa Politeknik Manufaktur Negeri Bangka Belitung
Vivin Mahat Putri Politeknik Manufaktur Negeri Bangka Belitung
Evvin Faristasari Politeknik Manufaktur Negeri Bangka Belitung
Sirlus Andreanto Jasman Duli Politeknik Manufaktur Negeri Bangka Belitung
Satria Agus Darma Politeknik Manufaktur Negeri Bangka Belitung

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.29207/resti.v10i3.7446

Keywords:

cat, dermatophytosis, detection, fungal disease, YOLOv12

Abstract

Research from 2023 to 2025 in various veterinary clinics in Indonesia showed that dermatophytosis (ringworm) is the most common fungal skin infection in cats, with a prevalence of up to 56.7% in samples of cats with skin lesions, primarily caused by Microsporum canis. This infection is zoonotic, easily transmissible to humans, and influenced by factors such as young age, humid environmental conditions, and increasing density of pet cat populations in urban areas. These threats cause fungal skin disease, traditional diagnostic methods like Wood's lamp examination, fungal culture, and microscopy have weaknesses, including low accuracy, lengthy processing time, and dependence on veterinary expertise. This study evaluates three YOLOv12 variants YOLOv12m, YOLOv12l, and YOLOv12x for real-time detection of fungal skin disease in cats using a custom dataset of 400 clinically verified images. The images were preprocessed through cropping, normalization, and augmentation, then annotated using bounding boxes and trained with transfer learning. Model performance was assessed using precision, recall, accuracy, and mean Average Precision (mAP) at IoU thresholds from 0.50 to 0.95. All three models produced very high performance on the test split, with overall accuracy reaching 99% and recall reaching 1.00. Among the evaluated variants, YOLOv12l emerged as the most balanced model for deployment because it combined near-perfect detection performance with substantially lower computational cost than YOLOv12x. Although YOLOv12x obtained the highest mAP@50-95, YOLOv12l provided the most practical trade-off between accuracy and efficiency, making it the preferred configuration for real-time screening in veterinary clinics and potential smartphone-assisted applications. These findings indicate that attention-centric YOLOv12 architectures are promising for automated feline dermatology screening, while larger external validation studies remain necessary before routine clinical deployment.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

H. M. Zayani et al., “Cat Breed Classification with YOLOv11 and Optimized Training,” Engineering, Technology and Applied Science Research, vol. 15, no. 2, pp. 21652–21657, Apr. 2025, doi: https://doi.org/10.48084/etasr.10218.

R. S. Praveen, P. Sravani, S. Akhil, T. P. Reddy, and J. M. Babu, “Plant Disease Detection Using YOLOv7 Algorithm,” Int J Res Appl Sci Eng Technol, vol. 12, no. 3, pp. 2058–2064, Mar. 2024, doi:https://doi.org/10.22214/ijraset.2024.59272.

S. K. S. Rajan and N. Damodaran, “MAFFN_YOLOv5: Multi-Scale Attention Feature Fusion Network on the YOLOv5 Model for the Health Detection of Coral-Reefs Using a Built-In Benchmark Dataset,” Analytics, vol. 2, no. 1, pp. 77–104, Mar. 2023, doi:https://doi.org/10.3390/analytics2010006.

M. Shoaib et al., “An advanced deep learning models-based plant disease detection: A review of recent research,” 2023, Frontiers Media SA. doi:https://doi.org/10.3389/fpls.2023.1158933.

Z. Yuan et al., “Research on Calf Behavior Recognition Based on Improved Lightweight YOLOv8 in Farming Scenarios,” Animals, vol. 15, no. 6, Mar. 2025, doi:https://doi.org/10.3390/ani15060898.

L. Liu, J. Xie, H. Qin, X. Sui, and L. Zhang, “Precise detection of Eimeria oocysts in sheep: a deep learning model based on microscopic images,” Parasites and Vectors , vol. 18, no. 1, Dec. 2025, doi: https://doi.org/10.1186/s13071-025-07092-4.

A. Raza, F. Hanif, and H. A. Mohammed, “Analyzing the enhancement of CNN-YOLO and transformer based architectures for real-time animal detection in complex ecological environments,” Sci Rep, vol. 15, no. 1, Dec. 2025, doi:https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-025-26645-2.

J. Tao et al., “Coral-YOLO: An Intelligent Optical Vision Sensing Framework for High-Fidelity Marine Habitat Monitoring and Forecasting,” Sensors, vol. 25, no. 23, Dec. 2025, doi:https://doi.org/10.3390/s25237284.

A. Chowdhury, M. Jahan, S. Kaisar, M. E. Khoda, S. M. A. K. Rajin, and R. Naha, “Coral Reef Surveillance with Machine Learning: A Review of Datasets, Techniques, and Challenges,” Dec. 01, 2024, Multidisciplinary Digital Publishing Institute (MDPI). doi:https://doi.org/10.3390/electronics13245027.

Y. Tian, Q. Ye, and D. Doermann, “YOLOv12: Attention-Centric Real-Time Object Detectors,” Feb. 2025, [Online]. Available: https://arxiv.org/abs/2502.12524

J. Zhong, M. Li, J. Qin, Y. Cui, K. Yang, and H. Zhang, “Real-time marine animal detection using yolo-based deep learning networks in the coral reef ecosystem,” in International Archives of the Photogrammetry, Remote Sensing and Spatial Information Sciences - ISPRS Archives, International Society for Photogrammetry and Remote Sensing, 2022, pp. 301–306. doi:https://doi.org/10.5194/isprs-archives-XLVI-3-W1-2022-301-2022.

Y. Miao, W. Meng, and X. Zhou, “SerpensGate-YOLOv8: an enhanced YOLOv8 model for accurate plant disease detection,” Front Plant Sci, vol. 15, 2024, doi:https://doi.org/10.3389/fpls.2024.1514832.

P. Song, L. Zhao, H. Li, X. Xue, and H. Liu, “RSE-YOLOv8: An Algorithm for Underwater Biological Target Detection,” Sensors, vol. 24, no. 18, Sep. 2024, doi:https://doi.org/10.3390/s24186030.

R. Kaur et al., “YOLO-LeafNet: a robust deep learning framework for multispecies plant disease detection with data augmentation,” Sci Rep, vol. 15, no. 1, Dec. 2025, doi:https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-025-14021-z.

S. Burti, T. Banzato, S. Coghlan, M. Wodzinski, M. Bendazzoli, and A. Zotti, “Artificial intelligence in veterinary diagnostic imaging: Perspectives and limitations,” Res Vet Sci, vol. 175, p. 105317, 2024, doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rvsc.2024.105317.

Z. Xu, T. Wang, A. K. Skidmore, and R. Lamprey, “A review of deep learning techniques for detecting animals in aerial and satellite images,” International Journal of Applied Earth Observation and Geoinformation, vol. 128, p. 103732, 2024, doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jag.2024.103732.

S. Jahn, G. Schmidt, L. Bachmann, H. Louton, T. Homeier-Bachmann, and A. K. Schütz, “Individual behavior tracking of heifers by using object detection algorithm YOLOv4,” Frontiers in Animal Science, vol. 5, 2024, doi:https://doi.org/10.3389/fanim.2024.1499253.

L. Zhang et al., “Advancements in artificial intelligence technology for improving animal welfare: Current applications and research progress,” Feb. 01, 2024, John Wiley & Sons Inc. doi:https://doi.org/10.1002/aro2.44.

H. N. Ngugi, A. A. Akinyelu, and A. E. Ezugwu, “Machine Learning and Deep Learning for Crop Disease Diagnosis: Performance Analysis and Review,” Dec. 01, 2024, Multidisciplinary Digital Publishing Institute (MDPI). doi:https://doi.org/10.3390/agronomy14123001.

A. Upadhyay et al., “Deep learning and computer vision in plant disease detection: a comprehensive review of techniques, models, and trends in precision agriculture,” Artif Intell Rev, vol. 58, no. 3, Mar. 2025, doi:https://doi.org/10.1007/s10462-024-11100-x.

A. Rohan, M. S. Rafaq, Md. J. Hasan, F. Asghar, A. K. Bashir, and T. Dottorini, “Application of deep learning for livestock behaviour recognition: A systematic literature review,” Comput Electron Agric, vol. 224, p. 109115, 2024, doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compag.2024.109115.

A. Mao, E. Huang, X. Wang, and K. Liu, “Deep learning-based animal activity recognition with wearable sensors: Overview, challenges, and future directions,” Comput Electron Agric, vol. 211, p. 108043, 2023, doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compag.2023.108043.

P. Ezanno et al., “Research perspectives on animal health in the era of artificial intelligence,” Dec. 01, 2021, BioMed Central Ltd. doi:https://doi.org/10.1186/s13567-021-00902-4.

U. Ali, M. A. Ismail, R. A. Ariyaluran Habeeb, and S. R. Ali Shah, “Performance Evaluation of YOLO Models in Plant Disease Detection,” Journal of Informatics and Web Engineering, vol. 3, no. 2, pp. 199–211, Jun. 2024, doi:https://doi.org/10.33093/jiwe.2024.3.2.15.

S. Xiao et al., “Review of applications of deep learning in veterinary diagnostics and animal health,” 2025, Frontiers Media SA. doi:https://doi.org/10.3389/fvets.2025.1511522.

D. Walle Girmaw, “Livestock animal skin disease detection and classification using deep learning approaches,” Biomed Signal Process Control, vol. 102, p. 107334, 2025, doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bspc.2024.107334.