Detecting AI-Generated and Authentic Artworks Using a ResNet50 Convolutional Neural Network Architecture

Authors

  • Nadia Putri Nabila Universitas Airlangga
  • Bambang Suharto Universitas Airlangga
  • Fitri Noor Febriana Universitas Airlangga

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.29207/resti.v10i2.7362

Keywords:

AI image detection, deep learning, digital art, generative art, image classification, ResNet50

Abstract

The rapid advancement of generative artificial intelligence (AI) has obscured the distinction between human- and machine-created art, posing significant challenges to authentication, copyright, and artistic integrity. This study addresses the critical need for reliable verification tools by developing and evaluating a deep learning model to automatically classify artworks based on their origin. A ResNet50 Convolutional Neural Network architecture was fine-tuned for the binary classification task. The model was trained on a custom, perfectly balanced dataset comprising 868 images (434 AI-generated, 434 authentic artworks). The training protocol included extensive data augmentation to enhance generalization and an early stopping mechanism to prevent overfitting. The experimental results demonstrate a high level of classification performance. The model achieved a validation accuracy of 86.21%, with a precision of 0.88 and a recall of 0.84 for the AI-Generated class. A Receiver Operating Characteristic (ROC) analysis yielded an Area Under the Curve (AUC) of 0.929, indicating robust discriminative capability. Qualitative error analysis revealed that the model's primary challenges lie in classifying hyper-realistic AI-generated images and authentic artworks with surreal or digitally abstract styles. This study validates the effectiveness of the ResNet50 architecture as a reliable and accessible tool for digital art authentication. It contributes a well-documented performance baseline on a balanced, custom dataset, providing a practical foundation for future research. This work highlights key challenges and suggests future directions, such as the exploration of more advanced architectures and the development of larger, more diverse datasets to further improve detection accuracy.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

A. Y. Jeong Ha et al., “Organic or Diffused: Can We Distinguish Human Art from AI-generated Images?,” CCS 2024 - Proceedings of the 2024 ACM SIGSAC Conference on Computer and Communications Security, vol. 1, pp. 4822–4836, Feb. 2024, doi: 10.1145/3658644.3670306.

A. S. Nair, C. Solanki, N. P. Thomas, and S. S. Karim, “Impact of AI Art on Artists and Perception of Visual Generative AI: A Systematic Literature Review,” pp. 171–182, 2025, doi: 10.1007/978-981-96-5495-6_13.

M. B. Garcia, “The Paradox of Artificial Creativity: Challenges and Opportunities of Generative AI Artistry,” Creat. Res. J., 2024, doi: 10.1080/10400419.2024.2354622.

J. Deng et al., “A Survey of Defenses Against AI-Generated Visual Media: Detection,Disruption, and Authentication,” ACM Comput. Surv., vol. 1, no. 1, Jul. 2024, doi: 10.1145/3770916.

L. Lin et al., “Detecting Multimedia Generated by Large AI Models: A Survey,” Jan. 2024, Accessed: Nov. 21, 2025. [Online]. Available: https://arxiv.org/pdf/2402.00045

N. E. Neef, S. Zabel, M. Papoli, and S. Otto, “Drawing the full picture on diverging findings: adjusting the view on the perception of art created by artificial intelligence,” AI Soc., vol. 40, no. 4, pp. 2859–2879, Apr. 2025, doi: 10.1007/S00146-024-02020-Z.

Y. Wang, Z. Huang, and X. Hong, “Benchmarking Deepart Detection,” Feb. 2023, Accessed: Nov. 21, 2025. [Online]. Available: https://arxiv.org/pdf/2302.14475

Y. Zhang et al., “Enhancing Text Authenticity: A Novel Hybrid Approach for AI-Generated Text Detection,” 2024 IEEE 4th International Conference on Electronic Technology, Communication and Information, ICETCI 2024, pp. 433–438, Jun. 2024, doi: 10.1109/ICETCI61221.2024.10594194.

M. Li and M. Stamp, “Detecting AI-generated Artwork,” Apr. 2025, Accessed: Nov. 21, 2025. [Online]. Available: https://arxiv.org/pdf/2504.07078

L. Kearns, A. Alam, and J. Allison, “Synthetic Artwork Authentication Threats: Detection by Combining Neural Network and Blockchain,” Transactions on Emerging Telecommunications Technologies, vol. 36, no. 8, Aug. 2025, doi: 10.1002/ETT.70225.

H. Aboutalebi, D. Mao, R. Fan, C. Xu, C. He, and A. Wong, “DeepfakeArt Challenge: A Benchmark Dataset for Generative AI Art Forgery and Data Poisoning Detection,” Jun. 2023, Accessed: Nov. 21, 2025. [Online]. Available: https://arxiv.org/pdf/2306.01272

P. Khatiwada, J. Washington, T. Walsh, A. S. Hamed, and L. Bhatta, “The Ethical Implications of AI in Creative Industries: A Focus on AI-Generated Art,” vol. 1, Jul. 2025, Accessed: Nov. 21, 2025. [Online]. Available: https://arxiv.org/pdf/2507.05549

R. Hönig, J. Rando, N. Carlini, and F. Tramèr, “Adversarial Perturbations Cannot Reliably Protect Artists From Generative AI,” 13th International Conference on Learning Representations, ICLR 2025, pp. 98506–98546, Jun. 2024, Accessed: Nov. 21, 2025. [Online]. Available: https://arxiv.org/pdf/2406.12027

F. N. Febriana and I. Puspitasari, “Benchmarking Machine Learning Paradigms for Resume Screening on Imbalanced Data,” Jurnal RESTI (Rekayasa Sistem dan Teknologi Informasi), vol. 9, no. 6, pp. 1329–1338, Dec. 2025, doi: 10.29207/resti.v9i6.7123.

H. Ugail, D. G. Stork, H. Edwards, S. C. Seward, and C. Brooke, “Deep transfer learning for visual analysis and attribution of paintings by Raphael,” Herit. Sci., vol. 11, no. 1, Dec. 2023, doi: 10.1186/S40494-023-01094-0.

M. Domínguez-Rodrigo et al., “Artificial intelligence provides greater accuracy in the classification of modern and ancient bone surface modifications,” Sci. Rep., vol. 10, no. 1, Dec. 2020, doi: 10.1038/S41598-020-75994-7.

D. Kapon, M. Fire, and S. Gordin, “Shaping History: Advanced Machine Learning Techniques for the Analysis and Dating of Cuneiform Tablets over Three Millennia,” Jun. 2024, Accessed: Nov. 21, 2025. [Online]. Available: http://arxiv.org/abs/2406.04039

F. Milani and P. Fraternali, “A Data Set and a Convolutional Model for Iconography Classification in Paintings,” Journal on Computing and Cultural Heritage, vol. 14, no. 4, p. 18, Jul. 2021, doi: 10.1145/3458885.

K. Xu, “Automated Artist Identification Using Deep Learning and Transfer Learning Techniques,” Science and Technology of Engineering, Chemistry and Environmental Protection, vol. 1, no. 1, Aug. 2024, doi: 10.61173/KW89WM08.

I. A. M. Dioses, W. Castillo, P. N. Santiago, M. P. Geronimo, J. A. MacAso, and S. D. C. Domingo, “Performance of ResNet50 in Classifying Artificial Intelligence Generated Arts,” Proceedings of the International Colloquium on Signal Processing and Its Applications, CSPA, no. 2025, pp. 361–366, 2025, doi: 10.1109/CSPA64953.2025.10933073.

T. Dobbs, A. Benedict, and Z. Ras, “Jumping into the artistic deep end: building the catalogue raisonné,” AI Soc., vol. 37, no. 3, pp. 873–889, Sep. 2022, doi: 10.1007/S00146-021-01370-2.

J. H. Smith, C. Holt, N. H. Smith, and R. P. Taylor, “Using machine learning to distinguish between authentic and imitation Jackson Pollock poured paintings: A tile-driven approach to computer vision,” PLoS One, vol. 19, no. 6, p. e0302962, Jun. 2024, doi: 10.1371/JOURNAL.PONE.0302962.

L. Schaerf, E. Postma, and C. Popovici, “Art authentication with vision transformers,” Neural Comput. Appl., vol. 36, no. 20, pp. 11849–11858, Jul. 2024, doi: 10.1007/S00521-023-08864-8.

I. El Mallahi, J. Riffi, S. Mohammed, H. Tairi, and M. A. Mahraz, “Enhancing Traffic Safety with Advanced Machine Learning Techniques and Intelligent Identification,” Oct. 2024, doi: 10.21203/RS.3.RS-4987140/V1.

A. Shah, P. Ranka, U. Dedhia, S. Prasad, S. Muni, and K. Bhowmick, “Detecting and Unmasking AI-Generated Texts through Explainable Artificial Intelligence using Stylistic Features,” International Journal of Advanced Computer Science and Applications, vol. 14, no. 10, pp. 1043–1053, Oct. 2023, doi: 10.14569/IJACSA.2023.01410110.

S. S. Graham and T. Ghotra, “Metric selection and promotional language in health artificial intelligence,” medRxiv, p. 2021.09.27.21264169, Sep. 2021, doi: 10.1101/2021.09.27.21264169.

J. Gallagher and W. Pugsley, “Development of a Dual-Input Neural Model for Detecting AI-Generated Imagery,” Jun. 2024, Accessed: Nov. 21, 2025. [Online]. Available: https://arxiv.org/pdf/2406.13688

N. Imanpour et al., “The Visual Counter Turing Test (VCT2): A Benchmark for Evaluating AI-Generated Image Detection and the Visual AI Index (VAI),” Nov. 2025, Accessed: Nov. 21, 2025. [Online]. Available: https://arxiv.org/pdf/2411.16754v2

A. Mahara and N. Rishe, “Methods and Trends in Detecting AI-Generated Images: A Comprehensive Review,” Feb. 2025, Accessed: Nov. 21, 2025. [Online]. Available: https://arxiv.org/pdf/2502.15176

P. Bernabeu-Perez, E. Lopez-Cuena, and D. Garcia-Gasulla, “Present and Future Generalization of Synthetic Image Detectors,” Sep. 2024, Accessed: Nov. 21, 2025. [Online]. Available: https://arxiv.org/pdf/2409.14128

M. Mathys, M. Willi, and R. Meier, “Synthetic Photography Detection: A Visual Guidance for Identifying Synthetic Images Created by AI,” arXiv 2024, Aug. 2024, Accessed: Nov. 21, 2025. [Online]. Available: https://arxiv.org/pdf/2408.06398

D. Tariang, R. Corvi, D. Cozzolino, G. Poggi, K. Nagano, and L. Verdoliva, “Synthetic Image Verification in the Era of Generative AI: What Works and What Isn’t There Yet,” Apr. 2024, Accessed: Nov. 21, 2025. [Online]. Available: https://arxiv.org/pdf/2405.00196

L. Cao, “A Practical Synthesis of Detecting AI-Generated Textual, Visual, and Audio Content,” Sep. 2025, Accessed: Nov. 21, 2025. [Online]. Available: http://arxiv.org/abs/2504.02898

L. Meinen et al., “Deepfakes in Criminal Investigations: Interdisciplinary Research Directions for CMC Research,” Jul. 2025, Accessed: Nov. 21, 2025. [Online]. Available: http://arxiv.org/abs/2507.03457

V. Tonkes and M. Sabatelli, “How Well Do Vision Transformers (VTs) Transfer To The Non-Natural Image Domain? An Empirical Study Involving Art Classification,” Lecture Notes in Computer Science, vol. 13801 LNCS, pp. 234–250, Aug. 2022, doi: 10.1007/978-3-031-25056-9_16.

N. Mansoor, A. I. Iliev, N. Mansoor, and A. I. Iliev, “Explainable AI for DeepFake Detection,” Applied Sciences 2025, Vol. 15, vol. 15, no. 2, Jan. 2025, doi: 10.3390/APP15020725.

F. Mumuni and A. Mumuni, “Explainable artificial intelligence (XAI): from inherent explainability to large language models,” Jan. 2025, Accessed: Nov. 21, 2025. [Online]. Available: http://arxiv.org/abs/2501.09967

J. Ji et al., “Detecting Machine-Generated Texts: Not Just ‘AI vs Humans’ and Explainability is Complicated,” Jun. 2024, Accessed: Nov. 21, 2025. [Online]. Available: https://arxiv.org/pdf/2406.18259

S. Yan, Z. Wang, and D. Dobolyi, “An explainable framework for assisting the detection of AI-generated textual content,” Decis. Support Syst., vol. 196, Sep. 2025, doi: 10.1016/J.DSS.2025.114498.

Downloads

Published

2026-04-29

Issue

Section

Computer Science Applications

How to Cite

Putri Nabila, N., Suharto, B., & Noor Febriana, F. (2026). Detecting AI-Generated and Authentic Artworks Using a ResNet50 Convolutional Neural Network Architecture. Jurnal RESTI (Rekayasa Sistem Dan Teknologi Informasi), 10(2), 507-515. https://doi.org/10.29207/resti.v10i2.7362