A Hybrid Approach of Factor Analysis and Decision Tree for Epilepsy Onset Prediction Using Public Datasets

Authors

  • Eka Sabna Universitas Hang Tuah Pekanbaru
  • Des Suryani Universitas Islam Riau
  • Oktavia Dewi Universitas Hang Tuah Pekanbaru

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.29207/resti.v10i4.7253

Keywords:

decision tree, EEG, epilepsy onset prediction, exploratory factor analysis, interpretable machine learning

Abstract

Early prediction of epilepsy onset is crucial for supporting timely clinical intervention and reducing seizure-related complications. However, the high dimensionality and complexity of Electroencephalogram (EEG) and clinical data remain major challenges for conventional predictive models. This study proposes an interpretable hybrid framework integrating Exploratory Factor Analysis (EFA) and Decision Tree classification for early epilepsy onset prediction using public datasets. EFA was employed to reduce 15 observed variables into five clinically meaningful latent factors, which were subsequently used as inputs for the Decision Tree model. . According to experimental data, the suggested framework demonstrated steady classification performance with an accuracy of 88.14% and specificity of 88.73%, while its efficacy in identifying epilepsy beginning cases for early screening is highlighted by its sensitivity of 80.77%.. The latent factor representing clinical neurological abnormalities was identified as the most influential predictor in the classification process. Compared with conventional black-box machine learning approaches, the proposed model provides transparent decision rules and clinically meaningful interpretation while maintaining reliable predictive capability. All things considered, the suggested architecture is a viable path for creating clinically interpretable prediction models that facilitate transparent and trustworthy early epilepsy screening.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

E. Beghi, “The Epidemiology of Epilepsy,” Neuroepidemiology, vol. 54, no. 2, pp. 185–191, Mar. 2020, https://doi.org/10.1159/000503831

“Epilepsy: a public health imperative,” Jun. 2019. https://www.who.int/publications/i/item/epilepsy-a-public-health-imperative (accessed Aug. 26, 2025).

V. L. Feigin et al., “Global, regional, and national burden of stroke and its risk factors, 1990–2021: a systematic analysis for the Global Burden of Disease Study 2021,” Lancet Neurol., vol. 23, no. 10, pp. 973–1003, Oct. 2024, doi:10.1016/S1474-4422(24)00369-7.

E. Boran et al., “High-density ECoG improves the detection of high frequency oscillations that predict seizure outcome,” Clin. Neurophysiol., vol. 130, no. 10, pp. 1882–1888, Oct. 2019, doi: 10.1016/j.clinph.2019.07.008 .

S. B. Dumanis, J. A. French, C. Bernard, G. A. Worrell, and B. E. Fureman, “Seizure forecasting from idea to reality. Outcomes of the my seizure gauge epilepsy innovation institute workshop,” eNeuro, vol. 4, no. 6, Nov. 2017, https://doi.org/10.1523/ENEURO.0349-17.2017

X. Li, Y. Qiao, L. Duan, and J. Miao, “Epilepsy EEG signals classification based on sparse principal component logistic regression model,” Comput. Methods Biomech. Biomed. Engin., vol. 28, no. 8, pp. 1295–1303, 2025, https://doi.org/10.1080/10255842.2024.2321991

U. R. Acharya, S. Vinitha Sree, G. Swapna, R. J. Martis, and J. S. Suri, “Automated EEG analysis of epilepsy: A review,” Knowledge-Based Syst., vol. 45, pp. 147–165, Jun. 2013, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.knosys.2013.02.01

M. C. Guerrero, J. S. Parada, and H. E. Espitia, “Principal Components Analysis of EEG Signals for Epileptic Patient Identification,” Comput. 2021, Vol. 9, Page 133, vol. 9, no. 12, p. 133, Dec. 2021, doi: 10.3390/computation9120133

X. Zhang, X. Zhang, Q. Huang, and F. Chen, “A review of epilepsy detection and prediction methods based on EEG signal processing and deep learning,” Front. Neurosci., vol. 18, p. 1468967, Nov. 2024, doi: 10.3389/fnins.2024.1468967.

A. Jović, K. Brkić, and N. Bogunović, “A review of feature selection methods with applications,” 2015 38th Int. Conv. Inf. Commun. Technol. Electron. Microelectron. MIPRO 2015 - Proc., pp. 1200–1205, Jul. 2015, doi: 10.1109/MIPRO.2015.7160458 .

M. Simul, H. Talukder, and R. Bin Sulaiman, “Comparative Analysis of Epileptic Seizure Prediction: Exploring Diverse Pre-Processing Techniques and Machine Learning Models,” Aug. 2023, Accessed: Jan. 10, 2026. [Online]. Available:

https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2308.05176

L. Bai, G. Litscher, and X. Li, “Epileptic Seizure Detection Using Machine Learning: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis,” Brain Sci., vol. 15, no. 6, Jun. 2025, https://doi.org/10.3390/brainsci15060634

Κ. Tsiouris, V. C. Pezoulas, M. Zervakis, S. Konitsiotis, D. D. Koutsouris, and D. I. Fotiadis, “A Long Short-Term Memory deep learning network for the prediction of epileptic seizures using EEG signals,” Comput. Biol. Med., vol. 99, pp. 24–37, Aug. 2018, doi: 10.1016/j.compbiomed.2018.05.019 .

Y. Berrich and Z. Guennoun, “EEG-based epilepsy detection using CNN-SVM and DNN-SVM with feature dimensionality reduction by PCA,” Sci. Reports 2025 151, vol. 15, no. 1, pp. 14313-, Apr. 2025, doi: 10.1038/s41598-025-95831-z

S. Wong et al., “EEG datasets for seizure detection and prediction- A review,” Epilepsia open, vol. 8, no. 2, pp. 252–267, Jun. 2023, doi: 10.1002/epi4.12704

M. Farooq, A. Zulfiqar, S. R.- Diagnostics, and undefined2023, “Epileptic seizure detection using machine learning: taxonomy, opportunities, and challenges,” Accessed: May 06, 2026. [Online], https://doi.org/10.3390/diagnostics13061058

T. Mar Ingolfsson et al., “Minimizing artifact-induced false-alarms for seizure detection in wearable EEG devices with gradient-boosted tree classifiers,” nature.comTM Ingolfsson, S Benatti, X Wang, A Bernini, P Ducouret, P Ryvlin, S Beniczky, L BeniniScientific reports, 2024•nature.com, vol. 14, p. 2980, 2024, doi: 10.1038/s41598-024-52551-0

E. D. Pontes, M. Pinto, F. Lopes, and C. Teixeira, “Concept-drifts adaptation for machine learning EEG epilepsy seizure prediction,” Sci. Rep., vol. 14, no. 1, pp. 1–13, Dec. 2024, doi: 10.1038/s41598-024-57744-1;SUBJMETA.

X. Zhang, X. Zhang, Q. Huang, and F. Chen, “A review of epilepsy detection and prediction methods based on EEG signal processing and deep learning,” Front. Neurosci., vol. 18, 2024, doi: 10.3389/fnins.2024.1468967 .

H. Hairani, A. Anggrawan, A. Ningsih, K. Marzuki, L. G. R. Putra, and V. C. Rebecca, “Anemia Classification using Random Forest, SVM, and Naive Bayes Methods,” pp. 1–5, Nov. 2025, doi: 10.1109/ICEEIE66203.2025.11252384 .

A. Anuragi, D. S. Sisodia, and R. B. Pachori, “Mitigating the curse of dimensionality using feature projection techniques on electroencephalography datasets: an empirical review,” SpringerA Anuragi, DS Sisodia, RB PachoriArtificial Intell. Rev. 2024•Springer, vol. 57, no. 3, p. 75, Mar. 2024, https://doi.org/10.1007/s10462-024-10711-8

J. Caterson, A. Lewin, and E. Williamson, “The application of explainable artificial intelligence (XAI) in electronic health record research: A scoping review,” journals.sagepub.comJ Cater. A Lewin, E WilliamsonDigital Heal. 2024•journals.sagepub.com, vol. 10, Jan. 2024, doi: 10.1177/20552076241272657 .

N. Aziz, A. Manzoor, M. Qureshi, and W. Rashwan, “Explainable AI in healthcare: systematic review of clinical decision support systems,” medrxiv.orgNA Aziz, A Manzoor, MDM Qureshi, MA Qureshi, W RashwanmedRxiv, 2024•medrxiv.org, 2024, doi : 10.1101/2024.08.10.24311735

N. Freyer, D. Groß, and M. Lipprandt, “The ethical requirement of explainability for AI-DSS in healthcare: a systematic review of reasons,” SpringerN Freyer, D Groß, M LipprandtBMC Med. Ethics, 2024•Springer, vol. 25, no. 1, Dec. 2024, doi: 10.1186/s12910-024-01103-2 .

M. Frasca, D. La Torre, G. Pravettoni, and I. Cutica, “Explainable and interpretable artificial intelligence in medicine: a systematic bibliometric review,” SpringerM Frasca, D La Torre, G Pravettoni, I CuticaDiscover Artif. Intell. 2024•Springer, vol. 4, no. 1, p. 15, Dec. 2024, doi: 10.1007/s44163-024-00114-7

H. F. Kaiser, “An Index of Factorial Simplicity,” Psychometrika, vol. 39, no. 1, pp. 31–36, Mar. 1974, https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02291575

J. F. Hair, “Multivariate Data Analysis - Joseph F. Hair, William C. Black, Barry J. Babin, Rolph E. Anderson - Google Buku,” 2019. https://books.google.co.id/books/about/Multivariate_Data_Analysis.html?id=0R9ZswEACAAJ&redir_esc=y (accessed Aug. 26, 2025).

R. Ottman, “Genetic epidemiology of epilepsy,” Epidemiol. Rev., vol. 19, no. 1, pp. 120–128, 1997, doi: 10.1093/oxfordjournals.epirev.a017934

A. K. Ngugi, C. Bottomley, I. Kleinschmidt, J. W. Sander, and C. R. Newton, “Estimation of the burden of active and life-time epilepsy: a meta-analytic approach,” Epilepsia, vol. 51, no. 5, pp. 883–890, May 2010, doi: .10.1111/j.1528-1167.2009.02481 .

V. L. Feigin et al., “World Stroke Organization (WSO): Global Stroke Fact Sheet 2022,” Int. J. Stroke, vol. 17, no. 1, pp. 18–29, Jan. 2022, doi: 10.1177/17474930211065917

“A Clinical Guide to Epileptic Syndromes and Their Treatment, 2nd ed,” AJNR Am. J. Neuroradiol., vol. 29, no. 9, p. e86, Jun. 2008, doi: 10.3174/ajnr.A1231 .

F. M. C. Besag, “Epilepsy in patients with autism: links, risks and treatment challenges,” Neuropsychiatr. Dis. Treat., vol. 14, pp. 1–10, Dec. 2017, doi: 10.2147/NDT.S120509 .

K. Morales et al., “Stratifying cognitive and behavioral comorbidities in children with new-onset seizures – The influence of sociodemographic disadvantage,” Epilepsy Behav., vol. 165, Apr. 2025, doi: 10.1016/j.yebeh.2025.110267 .

J. E. Lawn et al., “Every Newborn: Progress, priorities, and potential beyond Survival,” Lancet, vol. 384, no. 9938, pp. 189–205, Jul. 2014, doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(14)60496-7 .

S. Sathyanarayanan, “Confusion Matrix-Based Performance Evaluation Metrics,” African J. Biomed. Res., pp. 4023–4031, Nov. 2024, https://doi.org/10.53555/AJBR.v27i4S.4345 .

H. He and E. A. Garcia, “Learning from imbalanced data,” IEEE Trans. Knowl. Data Eng., vol. 21, no. 9, pp. 1263–1284, Sep. 2009, doi:10.1109/TKDE.2008.239 .

W. Rahayu et al., “Synthetic Minority Oversampling Technique (SMOTE) for Boosting the Accuracy of C4.5 Algorithm Model,” J. Artif. Intell. Eng. Appl., vol. 3, no. 3, pp. 624–630, Jun. 2024, doi: https://doi.org/10.59934/jaiea.v3i3.469

Y. Han and I. Joe, “Enhancing Machine Learning Models Through PCA, SMOTE-ENN, and Stochastic Weighted Averaging,” Appl. Sci. 2024, Vol. 14, Page 9772, vol. 14, no. 21, p. 9772, Oct. 2024. https://doi.org/10.3390/app14219772

Downloads

Published

2026-08-01

Issue

Section

Computer Science Applications

How to Cite

Sabna, E. ., Suryani, D. ., & Dewi, O. . (2026). A Hybrid Approach of Factor Analysis and Decision Tree for Epilepsy Onset Prediction Using Public Datasets. Jurnal RESTI (Rekayasa Sistem Dan Teknologi Informasi), 10(4), 984-995. https://doi.org/10.29207/resti.v10i4.7253