A Novel Framework for Dynamic Semantic Network Analysis with Evolutionary Community Detection Applied to LMS Research

Authors

  • Anip Febtriko Universitas Negeri Padang
  • Muhammad Giatman Universitas Negeri Padang
  • Dedy Irfan Universitas Negeri Padang
  • Syafrijon Syafrijon Universitas Negeri Padang
  • Tri Rahayuningsih Universitas Andalas

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.29207/resti.v10i2.7250

Keywords:

artificial intelligence in education, learning analytics, LMS, temporal network analysis

Abstract

The rapid proliferation of Learning Management Systems (LMS) in K–12 education has generated a substantial body of research, yet how its core themes emerge, converge, and transform over time remains insufficiently understood. Existing bibliometric and topic modeling approaches produce static snapshots of the literature, structurally incapable of capturing the dynamic epistemic processes through which research communities form and evolve. This study introduces Dynamic Semantic Network Analysis with Evolutionary Community Detection (DSNA-ECD), a novel computational framework that conceptualizes the K–12 LMS research field as a living epistemic system — a conceptual reframing that constitutes a distinct contribution to the K–12 LMS literature beyond prior static approaches. DSNA-ECD integrates three methodologically principled components: transformer-based semantic embeddings via Sentence-BERT (`all-MiniLM-L6-v2`), selected for its capacity to capture latent semantic proximity beyond lexical co-occurrence; a hybrid weighting scheme empirically calibrated to balance structural and semantic network signals; and the Leiden algorithm for community detection, preferred over Louvain for its theoretical guarantee of well-connected partitions and superior modularity optimization. Applied to a two-decade corpus of K–12 LMS publications, findings reveal a maturing field progressing from exploratory fragmentation through consolidation toward sophisticated integration of AI-enhanced adaptive systems and learning analytics. Compared to co-citation analysis, LDA topic modeling, and static semantic networks, DSNA-ECD uniquely offers semantic depth, guaranteed community coherence, calibrated hybrid weighting, and full cross-temporal trajectory tracking. Critically, findings reveal urgent underrepresentation of equity, algorithmic transparency, and ethical deployment research as AI-enhanced LMS systems proliferate, with direct implications for researchers, educational technologists, and policymakers.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

D. Irfan, R. Watrianthos, and F. A. Nur Bin Yunus, “AI in Education: A Decade of Global ResearchTrends and Future Directions,” International Journal of Modern Education and Computer Science, vol. 17, no. 2, pp. 135–153, Apr. 2025, doi: 10.5815/ijmecs.2025.02.07.

H. S. Batubara, N. Jalinus, F. Rizal, and R. Watrianthos, “Mapping the Frontier: A Bibliometric Analysis of AI in Tertiary Education,” International Journal of Learning, Teaching and Educational Research, vol. 23, no. 10, pp. 62–81, Oct. 2024, doi: 10.26803/ijlter.23.10.4.

M. Muskhir, A. Luthfi, R. Watrianthos, U. Usmeldi, A. Fortuna, and A. Dwinggo Samala, “Emerging Research on Virtual Reality Applications in Vocational Education: A Bibliometric Analysis,” Journal of Information Technology Education: Innovations in Practice, vol. 23, p. 005, 2024, doi: 10.28945/5284.

A. D. Samala, L. Bojic, D. Bekiroğlu, R. Watrianthos, and Y. Hendriyani, “Microlearning: Transforming Education with Bite-Sized Learning on the Go—Insights and Applications,” International Journal of Interactive Mobile Technologies (iJIM), vol. 17, no. 21, pp. 4–24, Nov. 2023, doi: 10.3991/ijim.v17i21.42951.

R. Watrianthos, S. Triono Ahmad, and M. Muskhir, “Charting the Growth and Structure of Early ChatGPT-Education Research: A Bibliometric Study,” Journal of Information Technology Education: Innovations in Practice, vol. 22, pp. 235–253, 2023, doi: 10.28945/5221.

I. Dobre, “Learning Management Systems for Higher Education - An Overview of Available Options for Higher Education Organizations,” Procedia Soc Behav Sci, vol. 180, 2015, doi: 10.1016/j.sbspro.2015.02.122.

N. Emelyanova and E. Voronina, “Introducing a learning management system at a russian university: Students’ and teachers’ perceptions,” International Review of Research in Open and Distance Learning, vol. 15, no. 1, 2014, doi: 10.19173/irrodl.v15i1.1701.

B. Williamson, R. Eynon, and J. Potter, “Pandemic politics, pedagogies and practices: digital technologies and distance education during the coronavirus emergency,” 2020. doi: 10.1080/17439884.2020.1761641.

N. Cavus and M. S. Alhih, “Learning Management Systems Use in Science Education,” Procedia Soc Behav Sci, vol. 143, 2014, doi: 10.1016/j.sbspro.2014.07.429.

J. S. Mtebe, “Learning Management System success: Increasing Learning Management System usage in higher education in sub-Saharan Africa,” Int J Educ Dev Using Inf Commun Technol, vol. 11, no. 2, 2015, https://files.eric.ed.gov/fulltext/EJ1074158.pdf

D. Tranfield, D. Denyer, and P. Smart, “Towards a Methodology for Developing Evidence-Informed Management Knowledge by Means of Systematic Review,” 2003. doi: 10.1111/1467-8551.00375.

V. F. Rodriguez-Galiano, B. Ghimire, J. Rogan, M. Chica-Olmo, and J. P. Rigol-Sanchez, “An assessment of the effectiveness of a random forest classifier for land-cover classification,” ISPRS Journal of Photogrammetry and Remote Sensing, vol. 67, no. 1, 2012, doi: 10.1016/j.isprsjprs.2011.11.002.

D. Turnbull, R. Chugh, and J. Luck, “Learning management systems: a review of the research methodology literature in Australia and China,” International Journal of Research and Method in Education, vol. 44, no. 2, 2021, doi: 10.1080/1743727X.2020.1737002.

N. Reimers and I. Gurevych, “Sentence-BERT: Sentence embeddings using siamese BERT-networks,” in EMNLP-IJCNLP 2019 - 2019 Conference on Empirical Methods in Natural Language Processing and 9th International Joint Conference on Natural Language Processing, Proceedings of the Conference, 2019. doi: 10.18653/v1/d19-1410.

P. Holme and J. Saramäki, “Temporal networks,” 2012. doi: 10.1016/j.physrep.2012.03.001.

V. A. Traag, L. Waltman, and N. J. van Eck, “From Louvain to Leiden: guaranteeing well-connected communities,” Sci Rep, vol. 9, no. 1, 2019, doi: 10.1038/s41598-019-41695-z.

M. Callon, J. P. Courtial, and F. Laville, “Co-word analysis as a tool for describing the network of interactions between basic and technological research: The case of polymer chemsitry,” Scientometrics, vol. 22, no. 1, 1991, doi: 10.1007/BF02019280.

D. M. Blei and J. D. Lafferty, “Dynamic topic models,” in ACM International Conference Proceeding Series, 2006. doi: 10.1145/1143844.1143859.

Yuhefizar, R. Watrianthos, and R. Komalasari, “An LDA Analysis for Topic Modeling of the RESTI Journal,” in 2024 2nd International Symposium on Information Technology and Digital Innovation (ISITDI), IEEE, Jul. 2024, pp. 46–52. doi: 10.1109/ISITDI62380.2024.10796703.

M. Grootendorst, “BERTopic: Leveraging BERT and c-TF-IDF to create easily interpretable topics,” Zenodo, 2020.

S. Samsir, R. S. Saragih, S. Subagio, R. Aditiya, and R. Watrianthos, “BERTopic Modeling of Natural Language Processing Abstracts: Thematic Structure and Trajectory,” Jurnal Media Informatika Budidarma, vol. 7, no. 3, Jul. 2023, doi:10.30865/mib.v7i3.6426

J. Wang, Z. Zhang, L. Feng, K. Y. Lin, and P. Liu, “Development of technology opportunity analysis based on technology landscape by extending technology elements with BERT and TRIZ,” Technol Forecast Soc Change, vol. 191, 2023, doi: 10.1016/j.techfore.2023.122481.

K. Börner, C. Chen, and K. W. Boyack, “Visualizing knowledge domains,” Annual Review of Information Science and Technology, vol. 37, 2003, doi: 10.1002/aris.1440370106.

Z. Han, F. Battaglia, A. Udaiyar, A. Fooks, and S. R. Terlecky, “An Explorative Assessment of ChatGPT as an Aid in Medical Education: Use it with Caution,” medRxiv, 2023, doi: 10.1080/0142159X.2023.2271159

G. Palla, A. L. Barabási, and T. Vicsek, “Quantifying social group evolution,” Nature, vol. 446, no. 7136, 2007, doi: 10.1038/nature05670.

P. Mishra and M. J. Koehler, “Technological pedagogical content knowledge: A framework for teacher knowledge,” 2006. doi: 10.1111/j.1467-9620.2006.00684.x.

Downloads

Published

2026-03-12

Issue

Section

Artificial Intelligence

How to Cite

Anip Febtriko, Muhammad Giatman, Irfan, D., Syafrijon, S., & Tri Rahayuningsih. (2026). A Novel Framework for Dynamic Semantic Network Analysis with Evolutionary Community Detection Applied to LMS Research. Jurnal RESTI (Rekayasa Sistem Dan Teknologi Informasi), 10(2), 247-256. https://doi.org/10.29207/resti.v10i2.7250