YOLOv8 to YOLO11 Performance Benchmark and Comprehensive Architectural Comparative Review

Authors

  • Priyanto Hidayatullah Politeknik Negeri Bandung
  • Nurjannah Syakrani Politeknik Negeri Bandung
  • Muhammad Rizqi Sholahuddin Politeknik Negeri Bandung
  • Trisna Gelar Politeknik Negeri Bandung
  • Refdinal Tubagus Stunning Vision AI

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.29207/resti.v10i2.6598

Keywords:

artificial intelligence, computer vision, deep learning, YOLO architecture

Abstract

In the domain of deep learning-driven computer vision, YOLO is revolutionary. However, not all YOLO models are accompanied by academic articles and architectural diagrams. It complicates the comprehension of the model's operation. Moreover, the existing review papers fail to examine each model comprehensively. This work aims to provide a thorough comparative analysis of the architectures from YOLOv8 to YOLO11, allowing readers to swiftly understand the operational mechanisms and differences among the models. We analyzed the architecture of each YOLO version by reviewing relevant scholarly articles, official documentation, and examining the source code. In particular, we discovered that YOLOv8 through YOLO11 differ in novelty while sharing similarities in the anchor-free and Non-Maximum Suppression (NMS) aspects, except YOLOv10 (NMS-free). Each also has drawbacks, such as differing levels of complexity in the way features are connected (v8), architectural structure and training (v9), training methods or dual assignments (v10), inference, and code implementation (v11). While each version improves architecture, some blocks remain unchanged. This study helps readers understand different YOLO version architectures and inspires how to improve their performance. It also provides readers with a comprehensive architecture diagram and detailed descriptions of each block, serving as a reference for both academic and practical applications. In terms of performance, a benchmark using the Roboflow 100 dataset reveals that YOLOv9 achieves superior accuracy; however, it is eight times slower owing to its NMS mechanism. YOLOv10 is the fastest but least accurate, whereas YOLOv8 and YOLO11 provide a balanced compromise between speed and accuracy.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Author Biographies

  • Nurjannah Syakrani, Politeknik Negeri Bandung

    Computer Engineering and Informatics Department, Politeknik Negeri Bandung, Bandung Indonesia

  • Muhammad Rizqi Sholahuddin, Politeknik Negeri Bandung

    Computer Engineering and Informatics Department, Politeknik Negeri Bandung, Bandung Indonesia

  • Trisna Gelar, Politeknik Negeri Bandung

    Computer Engineering and Informatics Department, Politeknik Negeri Bandung, Bandung Indonesia

  • Refdinal Tubagus, Stunning Vision AI

    Stunning Vision AI, Bandung, Indonesia

References

C.-Y. Wang and H.-Y. M. Liao, “YOLOv1 to YOLOv10: The Fastest and Most Accurate Real-time Object Detection Systems,” APSIPA Transactions on Signal and Information Processing, vol. 13, no. 1, p. Article 1, 2024, doi: 10.1561/116.20240058.

M. Hussain, “YOLOv1 to v8: Unveiling Each Variant–A Comprehensive Review of YOLO,” IEEE Access, vol. 12, pp. 42816–42833, 2024, doi: 10.1109/ACCESS.2024.3378568.

M. Hussain, “YOLO-v1 to YOLO-v8, the Rise of YOLO and Its Complementary Nature toward Digital Manufacturing and Industrial Defect Detection,” Machines, vol. 11, no. 7, p. 677, Jun. 2023, doi: 10.3390/machines11070677.

R. Sapkota et al., “YOLO advances to its genesis: a decadal and comprehensive review of the You Only Look Once (YOLO) series,” Artif Intell Rev, vol. 58, no. 9, p. 274, Jun. 2025, doi: 10.1007/s10462-025-11253-3.

J. Terven, D.-M. Cordova-Esparza, and J.-A. Romero-Gonzalez, “A Comprehensive Review of YOLO Architectures in Computer Vision: From YOLOv1 to YOLOv8 and YOLO-NAS,” Machine Learning and Knowledge Extraction, vol. 5, no. 4, pp. 1680–1716, 2023, doi: 10.3390/make5040083.

A. Allmendinger, A. O. Saltık, G. G. Peteinatos, A. Stein, and R. Gerhards, “Assessing the capability of YOLO- and transformer-based object detectors for real-time weed detection,” Precision Agric, vol. 26, no. 3, p. 52, Jun. 2025, doi: 10.1007/s11119-025-10246-0.

G. Li, R. Jian, X. Jun, and G. Shi, “A Review of You Only Look Once Algorithms in Animal Phenotyping Applications,” Animals, vol. 15, no. 8, p. 1126, Apr. 2025, doi: 10.3390/ani15081126.

Ahealisi Yeerjiang et al., “YOLOv1 to YOLOv10: A Comprehensive Review of YOLO Variants and Their Application in Medical Image Detection,” jaip, vol. 7, no. 3, 2024, doi: 10.23977/jaip.2024.070314.

M. G. Ragab et al., “A Comprehensive Systematic Review of YOLO for Medical Object Detection (2018 to 2023),” IEEE Access, vol. 12, pp. 57815–57836, 2024, doi: 10.1109/ACCESS.2024.3386826.

S. S. Debsarkar, B. Aronow, and V. B. S. Prasath, “Advancements in automated nuclei segmentation for histopathology using you only look once-driven approaches: A systematic review,” Computers in Biology and Medicine, vol. 190, p. 110072, May 2025, doi: 10.1016/j.compbiomed.2025.110072.

M. Mao and M. Hong, “YOLO Object Detection for Real-Time Fabric Defect Inspection in the Textile Industry: A Review of YOLOv1 to YOLOv11,” Sensors, vol. 25, no. 7, p. 2270, Apr. 2025, doi: 10.3390/s25072270.

R. Ayachi, Y. Said, M. Afif, A. Alshammari, M. Hleili, and A. Ben Abdelali, “Assessing YOLO models for real-time object detection in urban environments for advanced driver-assistance systems (ADAS),” Alexandria Engineering Journal, vol. 123, pp. 530–549, Jun. 2025, doi: 10.1016/j.aej.2025.03.077.

A. R. Khekan, H. S. Aghdasi, and P. Salehpour, “The Impact of YOLO Algorithms Within Fall Detection Application: A Review,” IEEE Access, vol. 13, pp. 6793–6809, 2025, doi: 10.1109/ACCESS.2024.3496823.

M. A. R. Alif and M. Hussain, “YOLOv1 to YOLOv10: A comprehensive review of YOLO variants and their application in the agricultural domain (Version 1),” arXiv, 2024, doi: 10.48550/ARXIV.2406.10139.

M. L. Ali and Z. Zhang, “The YOLO Framework: A Comprehensive Review of Evolution, Applications, and Benchmarks in Object Detection,” Computers, vol. 13, no. 12, p. 336, Dec. 2024, doi: 10.3390/computers13120336.

C. M. Badgujar, A. Poulose, and H. Gan, “Agricultural object detection with You Only Look Once (YOLO) Algorithm: A bibliometric and systematic literature review,” Computers and Electronics in Agriculture, vol. 223, p. 109090, Aug. 2024, doi: 10.1016/j.compag.2024.109090.

A. Vijayakumar and S. Vairavasundaram, “YOLO-based Object Detection Models: A Review and its Applications,” Multimed Tools Appl, vol. 83, no. 35, pp. 83535–83574, Mar. 2024, doi: 10.1007/s11042-024-18872-y.

K. D. Apostolidis and G. A. Papakostas, “Delving into YOLO Object Detection Models: Insights into Adversarial Robustness,” Electronics, vol. 14, no. 8, p. 1624, Apr. 2025, doi: 10.3390/electronics14081624.

R. Varghese and S. M., “YOLOv8: A Novel Object Detection Algorithm with Enhanced Performance and Robustness,” in 2024 International Conference on Advances in Data Engineering and Intelligent Computing Systems (ADICS), Chennai, India: IEEE, Apr. 2024, pp. 1–6. doi: 10.1109/ADICS58448.2024.10533619.

M. Sohan, T. Sai Ram, and Ch. V. Rami Reddy, “A Review on YOLOv8 and Its Advancements,” in Data Intelligence and Cognitive Informatics, I. J. Jacob, S. Piramuthu, and P. Falkowski-Gilski, Eds., in Algorithms for Intelligent Systems. , Singapore: Springer Nature Singapore, 2024, pp. 529–545. doi: 10.1007/978-981-99-7962-2_39.

M. Yaseen, “What is YOLOv8: An In-Depth Exploration of the Internal Features of the Next-Generation Object Detector,” Aug. 28, 2024, arXiv: arXiv:2408.15857. doi: 10.48550/arXiv.2408.15857.

M. Hussain, “YOLOv5, YOLOv8 and YOLOv10: The Go-To Detectors for Real-time Vision,” 2024, arXiv. doi: 10.48550/ARXIV.2407.02988.

N. Jegham, C. Y. Koh, M. Abdelatti, and A. Hendawi, “YOLO Evolution: A Comprehensive Benchmark and Architectural Review of YOLOv12, YOLO11, and Their Previous Versions,” Mar. 17, 2025, arXiv: arXiv:2411.00201. doi: 10.48550/arXiv.2411.00201.

Y. Chen, X. Yuan, R. Wu, J. Wang, Q. Hou, and M.-M. Cheng, “YOLO-MS: Rethinking Multi-Scale Representation Learning for Real-time Object Detection,” 2023, arXiv. doi: 10.48550/ARXIV.2308.05480.

Glenn Jocher, Paula Derrenger, and Muhammad Rizwan Munawar, “Home - Ultralytics YOLO Docs.” Accessed: Jan. 13, 2025. [Online]. Available: https://docs.ultralytics.com/

C.-Y. Wang, I.-H. Yeh, and H.-Y. M. Liao, “YOLOv9: Learning What You Want to Learn Using Programmable Gradient Information (Version 2),” arXiv, 2024, doi: 10.48550/ARXIV.2402.13616.

A. Wang et al., “YOLOv10: Real-Time End-to-End Object Detection,” in Advances in Neural Information Processing Systems, A. Globerson, L. Mackey, D. Belgrave, A. Fan, U. Paquet, J. Tomczak, and C. Zhang, Eds., Curran Associates, Inc., 2024, pp. 107984–108011. [Online]. Available: https://proceedings.neurips.cc/paper_files/paper/2024/file/c34ddd05eb089991f06f3c5dc36836e0-Paper-Conference.pdf

R. Khanam and M. Hussain, “YOLOv11: An Overview of the Key Architectural Enhancements,” 2024, arXiv. doi: 10.48550/ARXIV.2410.17725.

R. Sapkota et al., “YOLO11 to Its Genesis: A Decadal and Comprehensive Review of The You Only Look Once (YOLO) Series,” 2024, arXiv. doi: 10.48550/ARXIV.2406.19407.

M. Hussain and R. Khanam, “In-Depth Review of YOLOv1 to YOLOv10 Variants for Enhanced Photovoltaic Defect Detection,” Solar, vol. 4, no. 3, pp. 351–386, Jun. 2024, doi: 10.3390/solar4030016.

G. Jocher, J. Qiu, and A. Chaurasia, Ultralytics YOLO. (Jan. 2023). Python. Accessed: Aug. 22, 2025. [Online]. Available: https://github.com/ultralytics/ultralytics

K.-Y. Wong, WongKinYiu/yolov9. (Aug. 22, 2025). Python. Accessed: Aug. 22, 2025. [Online]. Available: https://github.com/WongKinYiu/yolov9

THU-MIG/yolov10. (Aug. 22, 2025). Python. THU-MIG. Accessed: Aug. 22, 2025. [Online]. Available: https://github.com/THU-MIG/yolov10

Glenn Jocher and Paula Derrenger, “yolov8.yaml.” Accessed: Jan. 20, 2025. [Online]. Available: https://github.com/ultralytics/ultralytics/blob/main/ultralytics/cfg/models/v8/yolov8.yaml

G. Jocher, “YOLO by Ultralytics.” [Online]. Available: https://github.com/ultralytics/ultralytics/issues/1200#issuecomment-1454873251

Glenn Jocher, “Understanding SPP and SPPF implementation · Issue #8785 · ultralytics/yolov5,” GitHub. Accessed: Nov. 06, 2024. [Online]. Available: https://github.com/ultralytics/yolov5/issues/8785

Priyanto Hidayatullah and Refdinal Tubagus, YOLOv8 Architecture Detailed Explanation - A Complete Breakdown, (Oct. 28, 2023). Accessed: Jan. 20, 2025. [Online Video]. Available: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=HQXhDO7COj8

RangeKing, “RangeKing,” GitHub. Accessed: Jul. 31, 2023. [Online]. Available: https://github.com/RangeKing

Priyanto Hidayatullah and Refdinal Tubagus, YOLOv9 Architecture Explained, (Apr. 19, 2024). Accessed: Jan. 20, 2025. [Online Video]. Available: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=oZ6I1VHpil0

W. Ao, “Yolov10l.yaml.” May 23, 2024. [Online]. Available: https://github.com/THU-MIG/yolov10/blob/main/ultralytics/cfg/models/v10/yolov10l.yaml

Priyanto Hidayatullah and Refdinal Tubagus, YOLOv10 Architecture Explained - A Complete Breakdown, (Sep. 03, 2024). Accessed: Jan. 20, 2025. [Online Video]. Available: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=A6rHMzRvs98

Glenn Jocher and Paula Derrenger, “yolo11.yaml.” Accessed: Jan. 20, 2025. [Online]. Available: https://github.com/ultralytics/ultralytics/blob/main/ultralytics/cfg/models/11/yolo11.yaml

Y. Ying and L. KeXin, “Effect analysis of Self built low-quality scene image set super-resolution reconstruction based on deep learning technology,” in 2024 International Conference on Electronic Engineering and Information Systems (EEISS), Changsha, China: IEEE, Jan. 2024, pp. 203–206. doi: 10.1109/eeiss62553.2024.00043.

S. Saponara and A. Elhanashi, “Impact of Image Resizing on Deep Learning Detectors for Training Time and Model Performance,” in Applications in Electronics Pervading Industry, Environment and Society, vol. 866, S. Saponara and A. De Gloria, Eds., in Lecture Notes in Electrical Engineering, vol. 866. , Cham: Springer International Publishing, 2022, pp. 10–17. doi: 10.1007/978-3-030-95498-7_2.

A. Zhang, Z. C. Lipton, M. Li, and A. J. Smola, Dive into Deep Learning. Cambridge University Press, 2023.

P. Hidayatullah and R. Tubagus, “YOLO11 Architecture�Detailed Explanation [Video recording].” Oct. 28, 2024. [Online]. Available: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=L9Va7Y9UT8E

Glenn Jocher, Ayush Chaurasia, Alex Stoken, and Jirka Borovec, YOLOv5. (Nov. 22, 2022). Ultralytics. [Online]. Available: https://github.com/ultralytics/yolov5

“Google Trends,” Google Trends. Accessed: Jul. 31, 2025. [Online]. Available: https://trends.google.com/trends/explore?date=today%205-y&q=YOLOv8,YOLOv9,YOLOv10,YOLO11,YOLOv11&hl=en

F. Ciaglia, F. S. Zuppichini, P. Guerrie, M. McQuade, and J. Solawetz, “Roboflow 100: A Rich, Multi-Domain Object Detection Benchmark,” 2022, arXiv. doi: 10.48550/ARXIV.2211.13523.

Downloads

Published

2026-04-21

Issue

Section

Artificial Intelligence

How to Cite

Hidayatullah, P., Syakrani, N. ., Sholahuddin, M. R., Gelar, T., & Tubagus, R. (2026). YOLOv8 to YOLO11 Performance Benchmark and Comprehensive Architectural Comparative Review. Jurnal RESTI (Rekayasa Sistem Dan Teknologi Informasi), 10(2), 341-354. https://doi.org/10.29207/resti.v10i2.6598