Information Technology Governance Awareness: A Proposed Formula for Assessment

  • Uky Yudatama Universitas Muhammadiyah Magelang
  • Dwi Ekasari Harmadji Universitas Wisnuwardhana Malang
Keywords: Information Technology; Governance; Awareness; Formula; Assessment

Abstract

This article aims to provide a proposed formula that can be used to measure the level of success in the practice of Information Technology Governance. To obtain this formulation, in-depth surveys and interviews involving several experts are needed. The calculation results show that organization G has an awareness value of 93 (good) with a maturity value of 3.13. On the other hand, organization E has an awareness value of 70 (medium) with a maturity value of 2.60. This proposed formula can be used as an alternative way to determine the level of success of an organization in the practice of Information Technology Governance by knowing the level of awareness. So far, to determine the level of success in implementing IT Governance practices in an organization, the method used is to calculate the maturity level that refers to COBIT best practices, which only focus on objects but do not focus on subjects (stakeholders) in the organization.

 

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Anwar Fattah, Hoga Saragih, and Resad Setyadi, “Determinants Effectiveness of Information Technology Governance and IT Performance in Higher Education Institution (HEI): A Conceptual Framework,” Int. J. Sci. Technol. Manag., vol. 2, no. 1, 2021, doi: 10.46729/ijstm.v2i1.135.

P. Borthakur, “Effectiveness of information and communication technology in promoting E-governance in India,” Int. J. Innov. Technol. Explor. Eng., vol. 8, no. 10, pp. 13–18, 2019, doi: 10.35940/ijitee.I8561.0881019.

G. Wiedenhöft, “An indicators-based approach to measuring information technology governance effectiveness: A study with Brazilian professionals,” ECIS 2014 Proceedings - 22nd European Conference on Information Systems. 2014, [Online]. Available: https://api.elsevier.com/content/abstract/scopus_id/84905845507.

C. Paper et al., “Definition of a Model for Measuring the Effectiveness of Information Technology Governance : a Study of the Moderator Effect of Organizational Culture Variables Definition of a Model for Measuring the Effectiveness of Information Technology Governance : a,” no. October 2016, 2015.

J. Kaur, “Modeling the impact of information technology governance effectiveness using partial least square,” ICSSBE 2012 - Proceedings, 2012 International Conference on Statistics in Science, Business and Engineering: “Empowering Decision Making with Statistical Sciences.” pp. 604–608, 2012, doi: 10.1109/ICSSBE.2012.6396636.

U. Yudatama, A. N. Hidayanto, and B. A. A. Nazief, “Analysis of benefits and barriers as a critical success factor in IT governance implementation by using interpretive structural model,” J. Comput. Sci., vol. 15, no. 7, 2019, doi: 10.3844/jcssp.2019.983.994.

U. Yudatama and B. A. A. Nazief, “Benefits and Barriers as a Critical Success Factor in the Implementation of IT Governance : Literature Review,” 2017.

S. De Haes, “COBIT 5 and enterprise governance of information technology: Building blocks and research opportunities,” J. Inf. Syst., vol. 27, no. 1, pp. 307–324, 2013, doi: 10.2308/isys-50422.

E. M. Luciano, G. C. Wiedenhöft, M. A. Macadar, and G. V Pereira, “Discussing and Conceiving an Information and Technology Governance Model in Public Organizations,” Inf. Technol. Gov. Public Organ., no. Walsham 2001, pp. 3–26, 2017.

L. N. Amali, M. Mahmuddin, and M. Ahmad, “Information technology governance framework in the public sector organizations,” Telkomnika (Telecommunication Comput. Electron. Control., vol. 12, no. 2, 2014, doi: 10.12928/TELKOMNIKA.v12i2.1834.

M. Safdar, G. Richards, and B. Raahemi, “A model of effective IT governance for collaborative networked organizations,” pp. 191–202, 2015, doi: 10.5220/0005537401910202.

Y. Barlette and V. V. Fomin, “Exploring the suitability of IS security management standards for SMEs,” Proc. Annu. Hawaii Int. Conf. Syst. Sci., pp. 1–10, 2008, doi: 10.1109/HICSS.2008.167.

R. Parvizi, F. Oghbaei, and S. R. Khayami, “Using COBIT and ITIL frameworks to establish the alignment of business and IT organizations as one of the critical success factors in ERP implementation,” IKT 2013 - 2013 5th Conf. Inf. Knowl. Technol., pp. 274–278, 2013, doi: 10.1109/IKT.2013.6620078.

J. W. Merhout and D. Havelka, “Information Technology Auditing: A Value-Added IT Governance Partnership between IT Management and Audit.,” Commun. Assoc. Inf. Syst., vol. 23, no. Articel 26, pp. 463–482, 2008, [Online]. Available: http://search.ebscohost.com/login.aspx?direct=true&db=bth&AN=41671737&site=ehost-live.

N. Anguelov, “Toward quantifying soft power: the impact of the proliferation of information technology on governance in the Middle East,” Palgrave Commun., vol. 3, no. 1, 2017, doi: 10.1057/palcomms.2017.16.

G. Lerch, J. Luiz, A. Carlos, G. Maçada, and P. Cunha, “International Journal of Accounting Information Systems The impact of adopting IT governance on fi nancial performance : An empirical analysis among Brazilian fi rms,” vol. 15, pp. 66–81, 2014.

M. Y. Yusliza, “Top management commitment, corporate social responsibility and green human resource management: A Malaysian study,” Benchmarking, vol. 26, no. 6, pp. 2051–2078, 2019, doi: 10.1108/BIJ-09-2018-0283.

W. Weli, “Information Technology Governance Disclosure in Annual Report of Indonesia Financial Institutions,” CommIT (Communication Inf. Technol. J., vol. 14, no. 2, 2020, doi: 10.21512/commit.v14i2.6626.

U. Yudatama, A. N. Hidayanto, B. A. A. Nazief, and K. Phusavat, “Data to model the effect of awareness on the success of IT Governance implementation: A partial least squares structural equation modeling approach (PLS-SEM),” Data Br., vol. 25, 2019, doi: 10.1016/j.dib.2019.104333.

R. D. Raut, B. Narkhede, and B. B. Gardas, “To identify the critical success factors of sustainable supply chain management practices in the context of oil and gas industries: ISM approach,” Renew. Sustain. Energy Rev., vol. 68, no. October 2016, pp. 33–47, 2017, doi: 10.1016/j.rser.2016.09.067.

U. Yudatama, A. N. Hidayanto, and B. A. A. Nazief, “Awareness and attitudes toward it governance: Empirical study,” J. Theor. Appl. Inf. Technol., vol. 95, no. 12, pp. 2680–2687, 2017.

C. E. Handford, M. Dean, M. Spence, M. Henchion, C. T. Elliott, and K. Campbell, “Awareness and attitudes towards the emerging use of nanotechnology in the agri-food sector,” Food Control, vol. 57, pp. 24–34, Nov. 2015, doi: 10.1016/j.foodcont.2015.03.033.

R. Chugh, S. Wibowo, and S. Grandhi, “Environmentally sustainable Information and Communication Technology usage : awareness and practices of Indian Information and Communication Technology professionals,” vol. 131, 2016.

C. Aoun, S. Vatanasakdakul, and Y. Chen, “IT Governance Framework Adoption: Establishing Success Factors,” Gov. Sustain. Inf. Syst. Manag. Transf. Diffus. IT, pp. 239–248, 2011, doi: 10.1007/978-3-642-24148-2_15.

J. Y. Yong, “Testing the stakeholder pressure, relative advantage, top management commitment and green human resource management linkage,” Corp. Soc. Responsib. Environ. Manag., 2022, doi: 10.1002/csr.2269.

A. Ako-Nai and A. M. Singh, “Information technology governance framework for improving organisational performance,” SA J. Inf. Manag., vol. 21, no. 1, 2019, doi: 10.4102/sajim.v21i1.1010.

F. L. Falchi de Magalhães, M. A. Gaspar, E. M. Luciano, and D. M. R. Napolitano, “Information technology governance: legitimation, theorization and field trends,” Rev. Gest., vol. 28, no. 1, 2021, doi: 10.1108/REGE-01-2020-0001.

M. Harbach, S. Fahl, and M. Smith, “Who ’ s Afraid of Which Bad Wolf ? A Survey of IT Security Risk Awareness,” 2014, doi: 10.1109/CSF.2014.15.

B. Khan, K. S. Alghathbar, S. I. Nabi, and M. K. Khan, “Effectiveness of information security awareness methods based on psychological theories,” vol. 5, no. 26, pp. 10862–10868, 2011, doi: 10.5897/AJBM11.067.

Yap May Lin, N. H. Arshad, H. H. Wah, Y. Bee, M. Yusoff, and A. Mohamed, “IT Governance Awareness and Practices: an Insight from Malaysian Senior Management Perspective,” J. Bus. Syst. Gov. Ethics, vol. 5, no. 1, pp. 43–57, Sep. 2010, doi: 10.15209/jbsge.v5i1.177.

N. Sau, C. Weng, and R. Ahamad, “Environmental Awareness and Behaviour Index for Malaysia,” vol. 222, no. 07, pp. 668–675, 2016, doi: 10.1016/j.sbspro.2016.05.223.

F. Veerankutty, T. Ramayah, and N. A. Ali, “Information technology governance on audit technology performance among Malaysian public sector auditors,” Soc. Sci., vol. 7, no. 8, 2018, doi: 10.3390/socsci7080124.

P. C. L. D. A. Costa, “IDENTIFYING RELEVANT IT GOVERNANCE CRITICAL SUCCESS FACTORS BY MEANS OF BIBLIOMETRIC ANALYSIS,” pp. 193–196, 2015.

U. K. Y. Yudatama, A. N. Hidayanto, and B. A. A. Nazief, “( Ism ) To Determine Key Sub-Factors At Factors : Benefits , Risk Reductions , Opportunities and,” vol. 96, no. 16, 2018.

Published
2022-12-30
How to Cite
Uky Yudatama, & Dwi Ekasari Harmadji. (2022). Information Technology Governance Awareness: A Proposed Formula for Assessment. Jurnal RESTI (Rekayasa Sistem Dan Teknologi Informasi), 6(6), 1064 - 1071. https://doi.org/10.29207/resti.v6i6.4310
Section
Artikel Rekayasa Sistem Informasi