Comparison of the ELECTRE, SMART and ARAS Methods in Determining Priority for Post-Natural Disaster RENAKSI Priorities

Komparasi Metode ELECTRE, SMART dan ARAS Dalam Penentuan Prioritas RENAKSI Pasca Bencana Alam

  • Agusta Praba Ristadi Pinem Universitas Semarang
  • Titis Handayani Universitas Semarang
  • Lenny Margaretta Huizen Universitas Semarang
Keywords: : mcdm, electre, aras, smart, disaster


Each organization must collect data as a result of the use of information technology. Over time the data is processed into information. The information collected is used as a basis for decision making. But not all information can be directly used for the decision making process. Necessary methods and weighting in the process of getting information. One model in a decision support system is Multi Criteria Decision Making (MCDM). The MCDM model makes it possible to provide the best choice of information from several choices of the many criteria and alternatives used. This study compares the MCDM model, namely the ELECTRE (Elimination Et Choix Traduisant la Realite) method, SMART (Simple Multi-Attribute Rating Technique), ARAS (Additive Ratio Assessment) as a priority determination for the handling of areas affected by natural disasters which must be addressed first in the RENAKSI (Reconstruction and Rehabilitation Action Planning), in this case earthquake natural disasters. The ELECTRE method has a different algorithmic process than SMART and ARAS. The validation test method ELECTRE, SMART and ARAS against dataset occurrence of the earthquake is become the results of this research. Spearman rank correlation values ​​for the three methods amounted to 0.96. And another correlation  method value of 0.85 for the ARAS method and 0.82 for the ELECTRE and SMART methods.


Download data is not yet available.

Author Biographies

Titis Handayani, Universitas Semarang

Fakultas Teknologi Informasi dan Komunikasi

Lenny Margaretta Huizen, Universitas Semarang

Fakultas Teknologi Informasi dan Komunikasi


R. K. Mavi, M. Goh, and N. Zarbakhshnia, “Sustainable third-party reverse logistic provider selection with fuzzy SWARA and fuzzy MOORA in plastic industry,” The International Journal of Advanced Manufacturing Technology, vol. 91, no. 5–8, pp. 2401–2418, Jul. 2017.

A. Hatami-Marbini, M. Tavana, M. Moradi, and F. Kangi, “A fuzzy group Electre method for safety and health assessment in hazardous waste recycling facilities,” Safety Science, vol. 51, no. 1, pp. 414–426, Jan. 2013.

M. Sevkli, “An application of the fuzzy ELECTRE method for supplier selection,” International Journal of Production Research, vol. 48, no. 12, pp. 3393–3405, Jun. 2010.

S. Suryanto and M. Safrizal, “Sistem Pendukung Keputusan Pemilihan Karyawan Teladan denganMetode SMART (Simple Multi Attribute Rating Technique),” Jurnal CoreIT, vol. 1, no. 1, pp. 25–29, 2015.

Z. Turskis and E. K. Zavadskas, “A Novel Method for Multiple Criteria Analysis: Grey Additive Ratio Assessment (ARAS-G) Method,” INFORMATICA, vol. 21, no. 4, pp. 597–607, 2010.

A. Hatami-Marbini and M. Tavana, “An extension of the Electre I method for group decision-making under a fuzzy environment,” Omega, vol. 39, no. 4, pp. 373–386, Aug. 2011.

V. Keršulienė and Z. Turskis, “An Integrated Multi-criteria Group Decision Making Process: Selection of the Chief Accountant,” Procedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences, vol. 110, pp. 897–904, Jan. 2014.

A. P. R. Pinem, “Implementasi Fuzzy ELECTRE Untuk Penilaian Kerusakan Akibat Bencana Alam,” J. Sistem Info. Bisnis, vol. 7, no. 2, p. 81, Nov. 2017.

S. R. Cholil, A. P. R. Pinem, and V. Vydia, “Implementasi metode Simple Multi Attribute Rating Technique untuk penentuan prioritas rehabilitasi dan rekonstruksi pascabencana alam,” register. jurnal. ilm. teknologi. sistem. inf., vol. 4, no. 1, p. 1, Nov. 2018.

P3B, Penilaian Kerusakan dan Kerugian (Damages and Losses Assessment). Jakarta: BAPPENAS, 2008.

BNPB, Perka BNPB Pedoman Pengkajian Kebutuhan Pasca Bencana. Jakarta: Badan Nasional Penanggulangan Bencana, 2011.

A. Mardani, A. Jusoh, and E. K. Zavadskas, “Fuzzy multiple criteria decision-making techniques and applications – Two decades review from 1994 to 2014,” Expert Systems with Applications, vol. 42, no. 8, pp. 4126–4148, May 2015.

S. M. M. Lavasani, J. Wang, Z. Yang, and J. Finlay, “Application of MADM in a fuzzy environment for selecting the best barrier for offshore wells,” Expert Systems with Applications, vol. 39, no. 3, pp. 2466–2478, Feb. 2012.

V. Kutut, E. K. Zavadskas, and M. Lazauskas, “Assessment of priority alternatives for preservation of historic buildings using model based on ARAS and AHP methods,” Archives of Civil and Mechanical Engineering, vol. 14, no. 2, pp. 287–294, Feb. 2014.

A. Sanjaya, D. M. Khairina, and S. Maharani, “rekomendasi pembelian grosir pada toko mainan menggunakan metode simple multi attribute rating technique (SMART) Dengan Google Maps.”

L. Pérez-Domínguez, L. A. Rodríguez-Picón, A. Alvarado-Iniesta, D. Luviano Cruz, and Z. Xu, “MOORA under Pythagorean Fuzzy Set for Multiple Criteria Decision Making,” Complexity, vol. 2018, pp. 1–10, 2018.

V. Gholami, K. W. Chau, F. Fadaee, J. Torkaman, and A. Ghaffari, “Modeling of groundwater level fluctuations using dendrochronology in alluvial aquifers,” Journal of Hydrology, vol. 529, pp. 1060–1069, Oct. 2015.

G. A. Montazer, H. Q. Saremi, and M. Ramezani, “Design a new mixed expert decision aiding system using fuzzy ELECTRE III method for vendor selection,” Expert Systems with Applications, vol. 36, no. 8, pp. 10837–10847, Oct. 2009.

E. K. Zavadskas and Z. Turskis, “A new additive ratio assessment (ARAS) method in multicriteria decision‐making,” Technological and Economic Development of Economy, vol. 16, no. 2, pp. 159–172, Jan. 2010.

V. Kutut, E. K. Zavadskas, and M. Lazauskas, “Assessment of Priority Options for Preservation of Historic City Centre Buildings using MCDM (ARAS),” Procedia Engineering, vol. 57, pp. 657–661, 2013.

B. Daneshvar Rouyendegh and S. Erol, “Selecting the Best Project Using the Fuzzy ELECTRE Method,” Mathematical Problems in Engineering, vol. 2012, pp. 1–12, 2012.

A. Hatami-Marbini and M. Tavana, “An extension of the Electre I method for group decision-making under a fuzzy environment,” Omega, vol. 39, no. 4, pp. 373–386, Aug. 2011.

H. Hadipour, R. Azizmohammadi, A. Mahmoudabadi, and M. Khoshnoud, “Application of ELECTRE Method for Sub-Contractor Selection using Interval-Valued Fuzzy Sets - Case Study,” p. 10.

T. Kaya and C. Kahraman, “An integrated fuzzy AHP–ELECTRE methodology for environmental impact assessment,” Expert Systems with Applications, vol. 38, no. 7, pp. 8553–8562, Jul. 2011.

B. Ka, “Application of fuzzy AHP and ELECTRE to China dry port location selection,” The Asian Journal of Shipping and Logistics, vol. 27, no. 2, pp. 331–353, 2011.

R. Yunitarini, “Sistem Pendukung Keputusan Pemilihan Penyiar Radio Terbaik,” Jurnal Ilmiah Mikrotek, vol. 1, no. 1, pp. 43–52, 2013.

T. Magrisa, K. D. K. Wardhani, and M. R. A. Saf, “Implementasi Metode SMART pada Sistem Pendukung Keputusan Pemilihan Kegiatan Ekstrakurikuler untuk Siswa SMA,” JIM, vol. 13, no. 1, p. 49, Feb. 2018.

H. Susanto, “Penerapan Metode Additive Ratio Assessment(Aras) Dalam Pendukung Keputusan Pemilihan Susu Gym Terbaik Untuk Menambah Masa OtoT,” vol. 12, p. 5, 2017.

S. Koçak, A. Kazaz, and S. Ulubeyli, “Subcontractor selection with additive ratio assessment method,” Journal of Construction Engineering, Management & Innovation, vol. 1, no. 1, pp. 18–32, Mar. 2018.

How to Cite
Agusta Praba Ristadi Pinem, Titis Handayani, & Lenny Margaretta Huizen. (2020). Comparison of the ELECTRE, SMART and ARAS Methods in Determining Priority for Post-Natural Disaster RENAKSI Priorities. Jurnal RESTI (Rekayasa Sistem Dan Teknologi Informasi), 4(1), 109 - 116.
Artikel Rekayasa Sistem Informasi